Tuesday, April 5, 2022

Leading the league in the middle of the 90s

I like cards that show 'league leaders'. They are usually relatively easy to find, and they provide a bonus card of certain players if those players happened to trouble the leader boards. Tony often did, so that often meant he had an extra card in sets issued in the 1990s.

Card Number 993: Fleer (league leaders insert), 1995; #6

The base cards in the set issued by Fleer in 1995 are all kinds of mid-90s crazy- when I blogged about Tony's card in the set I called it "the most 1995 card ever". Fleer toned their hyperactive designers down a lot for these inserts.


The write up on the back is how Tony had to "settle" for winning the batting title in 1994 with .394. The writer notes that Tony's average was rising at the point the season was curtailed. 

A couple of years later and Tony was picking up another National League title...

Card Number 994: Upper Deck Collector's Choice, 1997; #56

Of the eight batting titles that Tony won, his title in 1996 was the only one when he wasn't the outright winner across both major leagues. In 1996 he missed out to a young buck who was in his third season in the majors, Alex Rodriguez. Whatever happened to him, eh?


The way Upper Deck positioned the two photos makes it look like A-Rod is about to swing at Tony who is distracted by something else. 

There are a few names on the back that instantly jump out. And several that I'd never heard of before. Bernard Gilkey? Kevin Seitzer? 


Tony's team-mate, Ken Caminiti was sixth on the list. Ken was integral to the Padres National League West pennant win in 1996 and was also an All Star that year. 

But it's not just batting average that produces leader boards. In baseball, every statistic has leaders and sometimes the card companies decided to highlight some of those.

Card Number 995: Fleer Ultra [On Base Leaders insert], 1996; #3

This seems to be a weird stat for an insert set to focus on because it's very similar to batting average. The designer maybe felt the same way and it doesn't look like much care has been taken on the photo placement on the front. 

The back is much better. 

I had a Twitter conversation with Tim from Pennsylvania recently about the decision by Major League Baseball to ban the defensive shift, and we agreed that it just showed the reduced quality of hitting in the modern game. Would Tony have been curtailed by the shift? Unlikely, and this Fleer card from 26 years ago agrees.

I never think of Tony being the kind of player to draw a lot of walks, but his on base percentage of .404 suggests he got a few in the preceding season. A few blog posts back, I noted a stat on a Topps Gold Label card about walks, so pitchers sometimes opted to intentionally put him on base rather than risk a hit. And I don't blame them!

Total: 995 cards
 

4 comments:

  1. I really like that Collector's Choice LL card with the two photos laid on top of each other. I feel like I should own that card since it's a mid 90's CC card, but then again... I don't know if I've seen that card before.

    As for the shift...I remember hearing some guys (either during a game broadcast or maybe on MLB Network) talk about it and they mentioned that managers would never use the shift against guys like Gwynn or Ichiro, because they could place the ball where they wanted. In fact players like them would have loved to have teams use the shift on them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's my feeling all day long. Don't complain about the shift. Learn how to hit around the shift.

      Delete
  2. Not sure I agree with MLB outlawing the shift. Hitters will eventually come around and learn to hit the opposite field nullifying the shift.
    I like that '95 Fleer. Makes me wish I would have collected more back then.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That 1995 Fleer League Leader, in my opinion, is one of the better looking insert sets of that year. It is clean, not cluttered at all with cool tie-die lettering.

    ReplyDelete